Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Unit conversion of variables in examples\waqtel\waq3d_aed2

Unit conversion of variables in examples\waqtel\waq3d_aed2 5 years 2 months ago #34595

  • Yunhao Song
  • Yunhao Song's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 118
  • Thank you received: 9
Hi all,

When checking the t3d-aed2 example I found the unit of WQ variables is mmol/m3, while the field data measured are usually in mg/L. More details could be find in the table below. Could the moderators or anyone explain the unit conversion from (mg/L) to (mmol/m3)?

VariableMeasuredAED2
PO4mg/Lmmol P/m3
NH4/NO3mg/Lmmol N/m3
phytoplanktonmg/L(Chla)mmol C/m3

Take chlorophyll a as an example, since the molar mass of Chla (C55H72MgN4O5) is 893.51g/mol, to my knowledge the conversion should be: 1 g/m3 = 1/893.51*55*1000 mmol C m/3, is that right?

Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
Yunhao
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Unit conversion of variables in examples\waqtel\waq3d_aed2 5 years 1 month ago #34661

  • pham
  • pham's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1559
  • Thank you received: 602
Hello Yunhao,

Sorry for the delay.

Here is an answer from Javier, a colleague of mine, who better knows about water quality processes than me.

Hope this helps,

Chi-Tuan


Hi Yunhao,
For all the variables, except for phytoplankton, your approach is right. For example, for the Oxygen (O2) since the molar mass of O2 is 32 g/mol you can convert mg/L (or ug/m3) to mmol/m3 as follows (after converting mg to g and L to m3):

1 mg O2/L = (1/32)*1000 = 31.25 mmol O2/m3

However, for the phytoplankton, the model calculates the biomass of phytoplankton expressed in mmol C/m3. That means all the content of C in the phytoplankton and not only within the Chlorophyll. For doing so, you ‘just’ need to fix a carbon to chlorophyll ratio (mg C/mg chla) that is included in the parameters list of phytoplankton:

Ycc [real]: carbon to chlorophyll ratio (mg C/mg chla)

You might need to find some bibliographic values for your simulated species. And, of course, it is a questionable way of doing so, since the carbon to chlorophyll ratio is not even constant for the same species; but the conversion from chloa to biomass is never easy...

Good luck with your simulations,
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Yunhao Song

The open TELEMAC-MASCARET template for Joomla!2.5, the HTML 4 version.