Hi,
I was wondering anyone could help me with the following problems. in fact, I think problem one is encapsulated in the second issue.
1) I am trying to model a flow in a rectilinear channel. When I construct the mesh I can't get a very good definition of the corner points - in some cases they end up getting missed out. This is presumably because the default edge length defined along the boundary doesn't necessarily coincide with the end of each segment.
I tried defining a hard point, but again, I guess the default edge length means that these points just get missed out. How do other people get around this problem?
2) For another simulation I am trying to model a rectilinear channel but with a headland on one side. I would like to increase the mesh resolution near the headland but on the other side, as the bounding wall is just straight I figure the mesh resolution could be higher.
Inspired (perhaps tormented, as I can't quite recreate the method) by something I saw in the telemac user conference, I have tried creating a closed line that surrounds the computational domain with a prescribed default edge length which is large and then defining an open line with a small edge length on the side adjacent to the headland. So, when I generate the mesh, the points inside grow in density. However, using this to define the density of the computational mesh is beyond me.
I hope I have explained these issues clearly. Can anyone help?