Hi
This is a tentative answer and I hope that it will be completed/modified by other users and colleagues.
I've never tried such case, but I don't see why one can not combine a weir and a culvert at the same location. If you look at the user manual, the weir is defined with two sets of boundary nodes which should correspond 1 to 1. The flowrate is then obtained using some ampiric formulae depending on the case "submerged" or "unsubmerged" weir.
set 1 + + + +
set 2 + + + +
For the culvert, you have to link two points which are declared as source points and which are identified with their coordinates
ABSCISSAE OF SOURCES: X1 ; X2
ORDINATES OF SOURCES: Y1 ; Y2
WATER DISCHARGE OF SOURCES: 0. ; 0.
So for the example I give here, you can define 4 culverts.
In such way, the culverts will be actived for all free surface and weir will be activated only when the threshold is reached.
Some questions have to be clarified. I guess that the computed flowrate for weir will be dependant on the one of the culverts; so one can ask if the hydraulic laws used for both structures will stay valid. Moreover, the calibration of the obtained model is easy or not?
I'm curious to see if the solution is working or not, is efficient or not.
to be continued ...
Riadh