Mass conservation through a weir
9 years 3 weeks ago #18793
Chris C.
Hello everyone,
I have a model which includes 2 weirs (each defined by two rows of nodes; tangential velocity is neglected). I have placed control sections upstream and downstream of each weir, using the extreme weir nodes to define the sections.
I observe discrepancies (up to 5%) in the upstream and downstream flowrates.
My question thus is: is this observation a consequence of the way the flowrates are computed (how can I then be certain that the flowrates upstream and downstream are equal) or do I have a problem of mass conservation through the weirs?
Many thanks for your help,
Christophe.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Mass conservation through a weir
9 years 3 weeks ago #18799
riadh
Hello Christophe
Theoretically, mass is conserved through weirs. However:
- yes it could be a problem of control section especially if these latters are matching only boundary nodes
- you can verify the mass conservation by post-processing the result file. Most of post-processors can compute accurately flowrates through a given section
- first, be sure you are using mass conservative schemes befor going on with you verification.
I hope that this helps
with my best regards
Riadh
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Mass conservation through a weir
9 years 1 week ago #18893
Chris C.
Hello Riadh,
Thank you for these pieces of advice.
Have a nice day,
Christophe.
PS: Just to complete the answer:
> the control sections are indeed only on boundary points,
> I am not sure Blue Kenue allows computing flow rates in an easy way (I will try with another method),
> the schemes I use are 1;5 (I believe they are mass conservative).
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Great news: The next TELEMAC User Conference will be organised by Bangor University on the 15th and 16th of October 2025, at the School of Ocean Sciences in Menai Bridge, on the Isle of Anglesey, Wale [ ... ]