@Christophe. Thanks for your thinking along.
I am using the version 1.2.0 of Fudaa, apparently the latest one available from
prepro.fudaa.fr/index.en.php
This version also complains about the customization of the path to the binaries of modelling suite. I have pointed out this in this
resumed and unattended post. I experience that problem whether I use the wrong writing v6p3r2 or the good one v6p3. NB I am working with a Linux system, although this should not make a difference, I expect.
About changing the dico file. Changing what into what? I guess fudaa complains about lines 4465-4481 of the dico. I cannot spot obvious syntactic errors myself:
/ NOUVEAUTES 5.9
/
NOM = 'COURBES DE TARAGE'
NOM1 = 'STAGE-DISCHARGE CURVES'
TYPE = ENTIER
INDEX = 68
MNEMO = 'STA_DIS_CURVES'
TAILLE = 2
CHOIX = '0="non"';'1="Z(Q)"';'non programme 2="Q(Z)"'
CHOIX1 = '0="no"';'1="Z(Q)"';'not programmed 2="Q(Z)"'
RUBRIQUE = 'CONDITIONS LIMITES'
RUBRIQUE1 = 'BOUNDARY CONDITIONS'
NIVEAU = 1
AIDE = 'Indique si une courbe de tarage doit etre utilisee
pour une frontiere 0:non 1:Z(Q) 2: Q(Z) (2 non programme)'
AIDE1 = 'Says if a discharge-elevation curve must be used
for a given boundary :NO 1:Z(Q) 2: Q(Z) (2 not programmed)'
No question that a properly working Fudaa has the potential to be a good tool. But I'm doubting this is properly a working tool. Certainly, in my experience, it's not newcomer-friendly