Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The best way to model inflow to dry bed

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 11 months ago #28427

  • shenh
  • shenh's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 148
  • Thank you received: 37
I am setting up a t2d model with single inflow boundary and with dry bed as initial conditions. I understand with inflow boundary i need to have some water at the inflow boundary for the program to calculate inflow velocity. I can use continued computation to accomplish this. In the initial conditions file, I will set initial depth to very small value (say 0.01 m) only for the nodes at the inflow boundary, and zero depth for elsewhere.

Alternatively, i can use source points at the inflow boundary nodes. I will divide the temporal flow by the total number of nodes at inflow boundary, and set the new hydrograph in the source file.

Could anyone comment on both methods? I am also wondering whether there is a better way to model this.

Your inputs are greatly appreciated,

Hailiang
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 11 months ago #28428

  • konsonaut
  • konsonaut's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • openTELEMAC Guru
  • Posts: 413
  • Thank you received: 144
Hi,

option 1 should work normally. We use it to initialize flood simulations.

With best regards,
Clemens
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 11 months ago #28437

  • shenh
  • shenh's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 148
  • Thank you received: 37
Thanks. Have you compared option 1 with the source method? I am wondering how different the results could be.

How the code handle both methods internally?

Hailiang
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 11 months ago #28440

  • konsonaut
  • konsonaut's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • openTELEMAC Guru
  • Posts: 413
  • Thank you received: 144
Hi,

what I remember this is well explained in the user manual.
The fundamental difference between the methods is that by prescribing the discharge by means of source terms, the momentum is not accounted. Hence, depending on your case, you should prescribe also velocities at the source points. I never did this.

Best regards,
Clemens
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 11 months ago #28453

  • riadh
  • riadh's Avatar
Hello

Yes as said by Clemens, the option with soruces will give less physical result locally since it will just introduce water without preveleged direction for the velocity. This will give wrong momentum in the vicinity of the boundary but also could even distord all the hydrodynamics downstream.
Conclusion: option1 is highly recommended.

with my kind regards

Riadh
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 6 months ago #30149

  • Sameer Akhtari
  • Sameer Akhtari's Avatar
Hello everyone,

I have read this topic and I want to know how you assign a very small water depth as initial conditions for the liquid boundaries and zero else where, I mean by the keyword INITIAL CONDITIONS? If yes how? because this keyword then needs a single value for the entire domain.

Thank you in advance.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The best way to model inflow to dry bed 6 years 6 months ago #30190

  • riadh
  • riadh's Avatar
Hello
You can not use a keyword to introduce wome water in a particular place. Instead, you can use either Blue Kenue or fortran user.
You can see for instance the fortran file of examples dambreak or malpasset where subroutine condin.f is used. Subroutine inpoly.f (bief) can help you to detect nodes within a polygone.

with my best regards
Riadh Ata
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Moderators: pham

The open TELEMAC-MASCARET template for Joomla!2.5, the HTML 4 version.