Hello,
This is a difficult point to understand:
The impermeability of closed boundary is ensured in a weak form (in the sense of finite elements). That is to say that the flux across boundaries taken into account for the continuity is really zero for every degree of freedom (so there is no problem of mass conservation), but that the observed velocity may go across the boundary if the finite element approximation is not very good locally. So velocities across a closed boundary are a sign that locally you have a rather bad resolution (but mass conservation is preserved).
I am not sure that the bottom of your figure is an entrance (in which case the mesh could be improved). When the boundary conditions force a velocity to be across a nearby solid segment, the next velocity on the segment will tend to be in an opposite direction so that the integral of fluxes be however zero, you see this tendancy at the bottom right of your figure. This is why I give the advice to prescribe a profile at entrances so that velocities touching a solid boundaries be zero. This is specially true for lateral boundaries with an inflow at 90° angle to the main flow.
With best regards,
Jean-Michel Hervouet