Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: How to reduce the velocity and water depth fluctuation in the outlet ?

How to reduce the velocity and water depth fluctuation in the outlet ? 9 years 9 months ago #15963

  • harryyao
  • harryyao's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 190
  • Thank you received: 3
Dear all,

I am currently repeat the Guenter-experiment, I found that the velocity and depth in outlet is very unstable. The elevation of the outlet is exactly the same with the measurement.

So, any suggestions for reduce the fluctuation in the canal ?


Capture_2015-02-25.jpg



Best Regards
The administrator has disabled public write access.

How to reduce the velocity and water depth fluctuation in the outlet ? 9 years 9 months ago #15964

  • harryyao
  • harryyao's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 190
  • Thank you received: 3
The computation domain is 40 x 1 m. the *.liq, and *.cas are as follows:




File Attachment:

File Name: t2d_tel.cas
File Size: 3 KB
The administrator has disabled public write access.

How to reduce the velocity and water depth fluctuation in the outlet ? 9 years 9 months ago #15971

  • konsonaut
  • konsonaut's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • openTELEMAC Guru
  • Posts: 413
  • Thank you received: 144
Hello,

the steering file seems very ok. Some comments:
- first I would test with a lower time step. Have a look at your Courant numbers.
- try to set the initial elevation value equal to the prescribed elevation value
- the roughness of your lateral boundaries seems very high for a flume test case. Do you have such rough side walls?
- The liquid boundary file is missiing in your post.
Increase the inflow gradually from zero in the liquid boundary file using a ramp function to a steady inflow

Hope something helps.
Clemens
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: harryyao

How to reduce the velocity and water depth fluctuation in the outlet ? 9 years 9 months ago #15975

  • harryyao
  • harryyao's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 190
  • Thank you received: 3
Dear Konsonaut,

Thanks, my problem has been solved, It is the problem of the time steps and the mesh quality. I make a fine mesh and the reduce the time steps. Than it is OK.

Best regards

Harryyap
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Moderators: pham

The open TELEMAC-MASCARET template for Joomla!2.5, the HTML 4 version.