Hi All,
As described in a recent forum post to the Tomawac group, I have been attempting a 3-way coupling for a large coastal domain, with tides, waves and sediments including bed-roughness feedback, using v7p2r0 on HPC Wales.
A run of, for example, 12 hr duration ends correctly and the solution files for T2D, Tom & Sis are fine.
However, if I try again with Sisyphe now initialised with the 12hr solution file, as follows:
COMPUTATION CONTINUED = YES
PREVIOUS SEDIMENTOLOGICAL COMPUTATION FILE = NorthWales_sis_12h.slf
the run fails with the error below. I have changed nothing else (apart from giving a new results file name). It would seem that a conflict arises between Sisyphe and the global wave results file (WACRBI), in much the same way as described in my Tomawac post.
Does anyone know whether it should be possible in a 3-way coupled run to initialise Sisyphe in the way described above?
Thanks, Alan D.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Error with 1 processor (same error occurs with 16 processors)
=========================================================================
TEMPS : 0.0000 SECONDES 0IEME ITERATION
_____________
runcode::main:
:
|runCode: Fail to run
|mpirun /space02/users/a.g.davies/v7p2/NorthWales_3waycoup/NorthWales_t2d.cas_2018-01-16-11h43min30s/out_bord_agd_NEW
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|forrtl: severe (257): formatted I/O to unit open for unformatted transfers, unit 17, file /space02/users/a.g.davies/v7p2/NorthWales_3waycoup/NorthWales_t2d.cas_2018-01-16-11h43min30s/WACRBI